I have been receiving bugs.d.o emails which are unrelated to my
package for the last two-three days.
And their headers seem quite garbled: they include part of other
messages...
Included five of them.
Is there anything fishy going on? Or is the spam filter going crazy?
Phil.
--- Begin Message ---
Package: flim
Version: 1:1.14.4-1
Severity: normal
New upstream (flim-1.14.5) was released.
http://www.kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~tomo/comp/emacsen/lisp/flim/flim-1.14/flim-1.14.5.tar.gz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Your message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:58:16 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198887: emacs21: envvars not being inherited everywhere
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2003 10:27:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 05:27:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.78]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19VTyH-0002xG-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:27:17 -0500
Received: (qmail 2113 invoked by uid 504); 26 Jun 2003 12:27:16 +0200
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be by uid 501 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
(spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:.
Processed in 0.274768 secs); 26 Jun 2003 10:27:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([139.165.201.72])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 26 Jun 2003 12:27:15 +0200
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:27:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: emacs21: envvars not being inherited everywhere
X-Debbugs-CC: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.2-6
Severity: normal
Describing the problem at [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kai Grojohann and
Stefan Monnier suggested me to fill a bug. They also helped me to
describe it:
I put "export CVS_RSH=ssh" into the file ~/.foo. Then I log in
via kdm/gdm/xdm and start a shell. Typing "echo $CVS_RSH" into
that shell gives me ssh. Good. I invoke Emacs from that shell.
Typing M-: (getenv "CVS_RSH") RET into that Emacs gives me ssh.
Good. I invoke Emacs from the menu. Now typing M-: (getenv
"CVS_RSH") RET gives me nil. Bad.
Best regards,
Arnaud.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.20-powerpc #1 Mon Jun 9 11:05:19 EDT 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=fr_BE, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE
Versions of packages emacs21 depends on:
ii emacs21-common 21.2-6 The GNU Emacs editor's common infr
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libjpeg62 6b-7 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libncurses5 5.3.20030510-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii libtiff3g 3.5.7-2 Tag Image File Format library
ii xaw3dg 1.5-23 Xaw3d widget set
ii xlibs 4.2.1-6 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-12 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Cellule Programmation.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 198887-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2003 21:58:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 16:58:19 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.78]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Vel0-0006d6-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:58:18 -0500
Received: (qmail 15027 invoked by uid 504); 26 Jun 2003 23:58:17 +0200
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be by uid 501 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
(spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:.
Processed in 0.118581 secs); 26 Jun 2003 21:58:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([139.165.201.72])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 26 Jun 2003 23:58:17 +0200
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:58:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#198887: emacs21: envvars not being inherited everywhere
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I.e., I don't think it's a bug, and I don't think it has anything to
> do with emacs. Please correct me if I'm wrong about what you did.
Miles is rigth, it's not a emacs bug, very sorry for the noise!
-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Cellule Programmation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198427: fixed in sendmail 8.12.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2003 18:43:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 22 13:43:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.ddf.net [195.82.124.193]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19U9nv-0007kk-00; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:43:07 -0500
Received: from squit.ddf.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.ddf.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id h5MIh4hO023351;
Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:43:04 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by squit.ddf.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) id h5MIgUh2023274;
Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:42:30 +0100
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:42:30 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Mark Sheppard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sendmail: More granularity for *_INTERVAL
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.32 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.12.3-6.4
Severity: wishlist
In /etc/mail/sendmail.conf it would be good to able to specify
QUEUE_INTERVAL and MSP_INTERVAL in seconds rather than minutes,
perhaps by appending "s" to the number. I use a separate MSP daemon
in queue mode (to decrease the time it takes for sendmail to be run
when sending a mail) and would like to be able to tell it to run the
queue more often than once a minute (to reduce latency).
Mark.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux squit 2.4.16-686 #1 Wed Nov 28 09:27:17 EST 2001 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages sendmail depends on:
ii adduser 3.47 Add and remove users and groups
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libdb3 3.2.9-17 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [runtime]
ii libldap2 2.0.23-6.3 OpenLDAP libraries.
ii liblockfile1 1.03 NFS-safe locking library, includes dotlockfi
ii libsasl7 1.5.27-3 Authentication abstraction library.
ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6c-2.woody SSL shared libraries
ii libwrap0 7.6-9 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers library
ii m4 1.4-14 a macro processing language
ii perl 5.8.0-17 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report
ii sysvinit 2.84-2woody1 System-V like init.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 198427-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2003 05:53:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 27 00:53:23 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19VmAk-0000gN-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:53:22 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Vm4o-0001Xg-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:47:14 -0400
From: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#198427: fixed in sendmail 8.12.9-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:47:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sendmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libmilter-dev_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sendmail/libmilter-dev_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
sendmail-doc_8.12.9-4_all.deb
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail-doc_8.12.9-4_all.deb
sendmail_8.12.9-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.12.9-4.diff.gz
sendmail_8.12.9-4.dsc
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.12.9-4.dsc
sendmail_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sendmail
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 09:00:00 -0500
Source: sendmail
Binary: libmilter-dev sendmail-doc sendmail
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 8.12.9-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libmilter-dev - Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter)
sendmail - A powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent
sendmail-doc - A powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent
Closes: 189048 190259 191427 191641 192118 198427
Changes:
sendmail (8.12.9-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* move to sasl2 2.1.12 and openldap2 2.1.17 closes: #190259
and allows it to build again on testing closes: #191427
NOTE: There is no automagic way to migrate from sasldb to saslb2 :(
* allow removal when never configured closes: #191641
* correct autoconf expansion in man smrsh closes: #192118
* tighten up (somewhat) the logcheck rules closes: #189048
If anyone wants to help clean this up, especially wrt the new
ordering of these files, please feel free to send me what you've got :)
need to workout howto add example local rules to examples dir
* upstream patch for mailstats correction
* ack... /var/run/sendmail and below should be 775, not 770
* support persistent queue runners (thanks Snow-Man)
DAEMON_PARMS="<whatever> -qp<time>"
QUEUE_MODE="none"
* Better support of user specified {queue,msp}_interval closes: #198427
You can now say QUEUE_INTERVAL="10s", "2d", or "1w2d3h4m5s" and things
will just work (same goes for MSP_INTERVAL) - but see below for CRON
NOTE: This area was messy - and the generated crontab files were often
wrong and miss-parsed.
NOTE: This works better now, but crontimes may be rounded/different
that what you'd get from running something as a daemon!
Specifically: time is rounded to the nearest CRON interval -
90m == 2 hours!!! Often not a problem, but be aware!
Files:
2effa24a1c2fd0b27a52561e161615d3 896 mail extra sendmail_8.12.9-4.dsc
a38fe00e88a09c05d8e8b3c4af1da9cf 300799 mail extra sendmail_8.12.9-4.diff.gz
af7617ac3dba7f27e4a4b24726413b75 790214 doc extra sendmail-doc_8.12.9-4_all.deb
0f919f3c963f2c8648a50a8259f96051 977024 mail extra sendmail_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
9442407ab8f492e46e2d3a410114ba1c 272712 libdevel extra
libmilter-dev_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBPvvU36VTksHk9ElFAQGsmQP/UpSWWiv6YNw4/br2ZtwloT6uI/hcfEd8
B9utqSAW82ecsYgeDaeEr8bHeQjKhmcK1WDWKtBKfDEZQwJWTcb4DX9qFMxoq/z/
vv1KqBD7uxVY48W0sThoHVdGYJLytprdgzn9tyApm92toMrN1ozvoSdz/29qJnK3
aOT5DWCZryg=
=5jPV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:47:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#191427: fixed in sendmail 8.12.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2003 15:41:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 30 10:41:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from naf.b2b2c.ca [207.35.94.138] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19Ati7-0004zC-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:41:31 -0500
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=spamcop.net ident=nytral)
by naf.b2b2c.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19Atgh-0006sK-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:40:03 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:40:03 -0400
From: Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030327
Debian/1.3-4
X-Accept-Language: en, fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sendmail: binary df files/high write io rate
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.12.3-7woody
Severity: grave
sendmail creates binary df files in mqueue, without corresponding qf files,
without entries in the logs anywhere.
It's also writting between 500kB/s to 2MB/s on the mqueue directory, whereas
it's processing barely 2 to 3 mail/s
totalling 1mbps on the nic. Something's fishy going on!
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux smtp.cidc.net 2.4.20-686 #1 Mon Jan 13 12:59:29 EST 2003
i686 unknown
Versions of the packages sendmail depends on:
ii adduser 3.47 Add and remove users and groups
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libdb3 3.2.9-16 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [runtime]
ii libldap2 2.0.23-6.3 OpenLDAP libraries.
ii liblockfile1 1.03 NFS-safe locking library, includes dotlockfi
ii libsasl7 1.5.27-3 Authentication abstraction library.
ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6c-2.woody SSL shared libraries
ii libwrap0 7.6-9 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers library
ii m4 1.4-14 a macro processing language
ii perl 5.6.1-8.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report
ii sysvinit 2.84-2woody1 System-V like init.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 191427-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2003 05:53:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 27 00:53:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19VmB8-0000ik-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:53:46 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Vm4n-0001Xa-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:47:13 -0400
From: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#191427: fixed in sendmail 8.12.9-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:47:13 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sendmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libmilter-dev_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sendmail/libmilter-dev_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
sendmail-doc_8.12.9-4_all.deb
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail-doc_8.12.9-4_all.deb
sendmail_8.12.9-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.12.9-4.diff.gz
sendmail_8.12.9-4.dsc
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.12.9-4.dsc
sendmail_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sendmail
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 09:00:00 -0500
Source: sendmail
Binary: libmilter-dev sendmail-doc sendmail
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 8.12.9-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libmilter-dev - Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter)
sendmail - A powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent
sendmail-doc - A powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent
Closes: 189048 190259 191427 191641 192118 198427
Changes:
sendmail (8.12.9-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* move to sasl2 2.1.12 and openldap2 2.1.17 closes: #190259
and allows it to build again on testing closes: #191427
NOTE: There is no automagic way to migrate from sasldb to saslb2 :(
* allow removal when never configured closes: #191641
* correct autoconf expansion in man smrsh closes: #192118
* tighten up (somewhat) the logcheck rules closes: #189048
If anyone wants to help clean this up, especially wrt the new
ordering of these files, please feel free to send me what you've got :)
need to workout howto add example local rules to examples dir
* upstream patch for mailstats correction
* ack... /var/run/sendmail and below should be 775, not 770
* support persistent queue runners (thanks Snow-Man)
DAEMON_PARMS="<whatever> -qp<time>"
QUEUE_MODE="none"
* Better support of user specified {queue,msp}_interval closes: #198427
You can now say QUEUE_INTERVAL="10s", "2d", or "1w2d3h4m5s" and things
will just work (same goes for MSP_INTERVAL) - but see below for CRON
NOTE: This area was messy - and the generated crontab files were often
wrong and miss-parsed.
NOTE: This works better now, but crontimes may be rounded/different
that what you'd get from running something as a daemon!
Specifically: time is rounded to the nearest CRON interval -
90m == 2 hours!!! Often not a problem, but be aware!
Files:
2effa24a1c2fd0b27a52561e161615d3 896 mail extra sendmail_8.12.9-4.dsc
a38fe00e88a09c05d8e8b3c4af1da9cf 300799 mail extra sendmail_8.12.9-4.diff.gz
af7617ac3dba7f27e4a4b24726413b75 790214 doc extra sendmail-doc_8.12.9-4_all.deb
0f919f3c963f2c8648a50a8259f96051 977024 mail extra sendmail_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
9442407ab8f492e46e2d3a410114ba1c 272712 libdevel extra
libmilter-dev_8.12.9-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBPvvU36VTksHk9ElFAQGsmQP/UpSWWiv6YNw4/br2ZtwloT6uI/hcfEd8
B9utqSAW82ecsYgeDaeEr8bHeQjKhmcK1WDWKtBKfDEZQwJWTcb4DX9qFMxoq/z/
vv1KqBD7uxVY48W0sThoHVdGYJLytprdgzn9tyApm92toMrN1ozvoSdz/29qJnK3
aOT5DWCZryg=
=5jPV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Your message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:08:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2003 19:18:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 19 14:18:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tuco.oof.net (acolyte.scowler.net) [66.92.109.225]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19T4vI-0005Ux-00; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:18:16 -0500
Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 729BE7003F; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:18:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:18:15 -0400
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: subversion: fails to run with older libapr0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: subversion
Version: 0.24.1-1
svn: relocation error: /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0: undefined symbol: gdbm_errno
This is with 2.0.46-2; upgrading to 2.0.46-3 alleviates the problem.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 197989-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2003 04:08:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 23:08:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns2203.ovh.net (dualmedia.fr) [213.186.36.30]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19VkX2-0008At-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:08:16 -0500
Received: (qmail 26256 invoked by uid 503); 27 Jun 2003 04:08:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO oink) (12.233.63.149)
by ns2203.ovh.net with SMTP; 27 Jun 2003 04:08:15 -0000
Received: by oink (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4E91241F9; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:08:15 -0700
From: David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=4.0
tests=USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
I added a shlibs.local in 0.24.2 that fixes this problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---