On Friday 04 July 2003 05:59, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Yes, keep the two versions of stunnel is probably the right way to handle > > this problem. Now the problem is that stunnel is uploaded in version 4 on > > stunnel package. What is the correct way to reintroduce stunnel for > > compatibility reasons ? uploading a new stunnel3 package will not > > resolve the problem. > > Epoch it and upload stunnel4 as a new package.
Thanks, I will upload a stunnel4 package and a stunnel with Epoch tomorrow. Best Regards. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue
