David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote: >>> me too! any package that doesn't build on m68k or arm is broken and >>> needs to be fixed, even if it works on x86 by chance! >> >> So, are you volunteering to help those of us without access to either >of >> the above architectures with "bugs" found in our packages? > >But Debian has ~public machines for pretty much every architecture. >I'd say "look on http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi";, except that's >down; I can at least point you at section 4.4 of the Developer's >Reference, though that doesn't say a whole lot beyond this. I admit >that this doesn't necessarily help for testing installers, but for >your own packages it should be straightforward for you to do testing >and bugfixing even on architectures you don't personally own a machine >for.
You forget, perhaps, that Jamin is stuck in the NM queue waiting for DAM approval. Since he's not an official DD yet, he does not have access to those machines... -- Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org> http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html