>db2: > This is pretty old... who still uses it, anyway? More specifically, > does anyone use libdb2++, and if so, are they only things which > aren't supposed to be transitioned?
OK, this is an odd list: Package: libdb2++ <snip> Reverse Depends: libdb4.1++,libdb2++ 2:2.7.7-3 libdb4.0++c102,libdb2++ 2:2.7.7-3 libdb3++c102,libdb2++ 2:2.7.7-3 libdb2++-dev,libdb2++ 2:2.7.7.0-8 animals,libdb2++ 2:2.7.7-4 What exactly is going on here? It appears that apart from 'animals', the only things depending on libdb2++ (the C++ interface to libdb2) are *future* versions of the C++ interface to libdb. Why are they depending on it? This seems odd to me. -- Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org> http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html