On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:00:27AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:56:50 -0400 > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I know that's 2.4.21, but I'm not going to unpack a whole 2.4.20 tree > > to demonstrate that it works the same way. It does. > > I never said it didn't work. What I said was that when I did it 2.4.20 > had the same error as if it were compiled with 3.3.
Then perhaps this particular problem was not with gcc 3.3. I think some additional investigation would be prudent before any talk about grave bugs. -- - mdz
