Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > with. The MIA problem is significant enough that NM might be the only > > way to tackle with it seriously. That means taking time to examine > > applications. > > BTW, has anybody done any research into what types of package > maintainers tend to go MIA? I would be especially interested in a > percentage of "old" style DD's, DD's who have gone through the NM > process, people going MIA while in the NM queue, and people going MIA > without ever even entering the NM queue. I'll try to do the statistics > myself if nobody has done it before.
And how many NMs go MIA because they still stuck in the NM queue after years? Should we ask them? :) MfG Goswin