On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:08:28AM +0200, cobaco wrote: > On 2003-08-20 10:13, Chris Cheney wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how > > > > about 2003-12-01 00:00:00 UTC? > > > > Do you have some Official Opinion(tm)[1] as the RM about what KDE, gcc, > > > X, gnome versions will be in sarge? > > > KDE 3.1.4 (KDE 2.2 _will not_ stay in sarge!) > > kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll > wait > for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again immediately after > release?
What recent change in the KDE releasing schema let you think that they will manage to get a really stable x.y.0 release [*] when it seems like it took 4 minor releases in the 3.1 branch ? Naturally, no offense intended to the kde guys. Needing only 4 minor releases to stabilize such an amount of code is really great. Bye, Mt. [*] ie, suitable for debian stable release, ie a version with which you could live for a year on your desktop, maybe dreaming of new features (we always want more), but not pesting against the bugs. I speak of course of the ideal debian stable release ;) -- Testing can only prove the presence of bugs. --- Dijkstra