"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > > > > The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy, > > > > i.e. build from source as they should. > > > > > > > > > > The question remains is simply removing all the extra source from > > > webmin-n.orig.tar.gz except that which is necessary to build the webmin > > > binary package (i.e not any of the modules which will have their own > > > source and binary packages) an aceptable solution to the problem or not? > > > > >From what I read in this thread webmin-n.orig.tar.gz also contains > > some non-free sources, right? > > > > It has source for all the modules including the non-free ones. However > the binary packages for those modules are built from seperate source > packages not this one. > > > Then you have no choice but split it up to get the rest into main. And > > when you don't have a pristine upstream orig.tar.gz you can split it > > up as far as you like or need to. > > > > The only reason for having the webmin.orig.tar.gz as it is was to provide > something approximating the upstream tarball. It sounds like I don't need > to bother about that.
The only way you could is to have the source in non-free and you certainly don't want that. MfG Goswin