christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it a common practice to use this kind of numbering (without a second part > after > a dash) for what I presume is a debian-made tarball (multiple upstream > tarballs > put together). > > gdesklets-data_0.13.1_all.deb > > Also (related) why not use a orig.tar.gz file? > My understanding is that the difference between 0.13.1 and 0.13, because > only the README.Debian has changed, it would have been a good thing to > base it on the previous tarball.
Yes, gdesklets-data is a debian native package (ie: there is no upstream tarball corresponding to this archive). -n version are revision on a same upstream tarball, but in this case we don't have any .orig.tar.gz .... Cheers, Sebastien Bacher
