On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 09:28:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > I agree if the FTBFS comes from something the NMUer did, then yes, it is > broken, but if it comes from general bad shape of the packages, then the > responsability is to the package maintainer
It's fine that you disagree. You're welcome to that. If you're going to act on your opinions though -- and not take responsibility for fixing the new bugs found when you upload NMUs -- then please do not NMU. Again: this isn't about finding fault, it's about taking responsibility for the quality of your NMUs, and making sure that *all* new problems are resolved whether you caused them or not. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Is this some kind of psych test? Am I getting paid for this?''
pgpAgaWnwYZlR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
