On 22-Sep-03, 14:14 (CDT), Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a well accepted fact among kernel developers that vanilla
> kernel.org kernels should not be used by end users. Debian has to patch
> the kernel, too. There isn't much choice.
Agreed, but there's a significant difference between including bug fixes
and de-facto required architecture-specific updates and including a
completely new subsystem backported from 2.5 yet calling it 2.4. For
$DIETY's sake, we keep ALSA as a separate patch/module, why is putting
in IPSEC justified?
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
