On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:54:09PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Because it is the only thing I could find that reflects Debian's > > take on security fixes: feature backports are to be avoided. > > That's because it's the position of the *Security Team*, and is > certainly not binding on other developers who are making changes to > packages in *unstable*.
I don't see how the package being in unstable affects any part of this argument. Will the feature backport be less desirable when the kernel-source package is released in a stable revision of Debian? --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
