On Oct 13, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> BTW, I may have been missing something as I did not read the beginning >> of this thread, but I don't see the point of packaging sysfsutils: >It is a separate upstream package. Then feel free to package it, as long as I keep udev I don't mind. :-)
Back to the topic, I think you should discuss with the upstream author the reasons for having no shared library. If he is only waiting for a stable ABI then I think you should really keep the library static. >> (which I ITP'ed some weeks ago) >Am I missing something? bugs.d.o/wnpp does not contain the word >'udev' and only once 'sysfs' (#215257, the ITP I'm talking about). I Probably I only sent mail to debian-devel, I was expecting to upload it sooner. -- ciao, | Marco | [2365 acrToiAT0AyME]