On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:26:42PM -0300, Tiago AssumpÃÃo wrote:
> First of all, maybe the most important, we have the freedom problem here.
> Itïs CLEAR, after analyzing his own words, that our friend Russell Coker
> has a big interest of getting Exec-shield as part of Debian Linux.
> That becomes even more clear when you see the affirmation, again his own
> words, he's employed by Red Hat.
>  
> I won't say here that Red Hat, Inc. would be manipulating information
> to force Debian users to use one of their products, because I would be going
> down, at the same level as Coker. Since I don't know Red Hat's relationship
> to this issue, I would go for how non-professional Russel Coker has been
> with his posts.

I think you're making unwarranted assumpÃÃos.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     I suspect Linus wrote that in a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     complicated way only to be able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |     have that comment in there.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Lars Wirzenius

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to