Hi! > [NB: When reponsding using the web archives, please get the References > and In-Reply-To: correctly. You may also consider setting MFT:]
I can't post from the lists.debian.org site. > On Tue, 04 Nov 2003, Peter Busser wrote: > >> PaX would take much more time so I can't do it. > > > > You cannot do it or you don't want to do it? > Russell has made it adequately clear that he doesn't have the time or > the desire to deal with PaX at this time. As a volunteer, that's > always his prerogative. [As a side note, if you are trying to enlist > volunteers, I strongly suggest not berating other developers while > doing it.[1]] Agreed, Russell is free to do what he wants. However, other Debian developers benefit from having accurate information, to base their opinions on. And so far I have seen statements on PaX that have been anything but accurate. I'm not in fact trying enlist volunteers. I try to offend as many Debian people as possible, so that they choose exec-shield. This to ensure that Adamantix will has an edge in security over Debian in the future. And it seems to be working very well so far. Besides that, I can imagine that gr-security does not work on the current Debian kernels. But really, PaX and gr-security are two completely different things. PaX is related to gr-security in the same way the Linux kernel is related to Debian. It is just a part of it, but the PaX project is independent of gr-security. > > In fact, anyone can do it Russell, I'm pretty sure even you can do > > it: > Why not volunteer to make the .deb, get a sponsor and get it uploaded > then? Good idea! Already did that in fact. So who do I send this new kernel-source .deb to? Groetjes, Peter Busser -- The Adamantix Project Taking high-security Linux out of the labs, and into the real world http://www.adamantix.org/