Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:56:38AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: >> >> As an academic exercise this is fine and dandy, but having two >> competing packagings of the same _basic_ component can't do us any >> good. > > This isn't a "competing" package. As I said before, the standard way Linux > kernel packaging is handled is "a good choice for the power user". I don't > intend to "replace" it or the like, just add more options for the people who > like them.
Having options for the sake of having options is, frankly, a hideously stupid design doctrine. Whose life will this package make easier? As a user, I have never been confused by Debian's "normal" Linux kernel packages. What specific benefits would your proposed package offer? Michael Poole