On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:59:51PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:48:06PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > Then how do you suggest maintaining a kernel 2.4.20 for one > > > architecture and a 2.4.22 for another architecture, when you can't even > > > test on either of them? > > > > I wouldn't. I'm going to track the latest minor version, just like the rest > > of Debian packages do. > > So you would recommend dropping support for architectures that do not > boot with the latest kernel ?
Submit the fscking bug reports and patches. Same as with toolchain packages.