#include <hallo.h>
* Matthew Garrett [Mon, Nov 10 2003, 12:42:48PM]:
> >> IIRC you prefered not to
> >> answer to it but refered to an URL which did not contain the answers.
> >
> >I don't recall seeing this question before. So unless you provide a link to
> >that, you're liing.
>
> Technically, no - even if he doesn't provide a link, it may be true. And
> even if the question wasn't asked before, he may be mistaken. Accusing
> people of deliberately telling falsehoods (and note the "IIRC" - for
> this to be a lie, Eduard would have to have known absolutely that what
> he was saying was not true) makes you look like a fanatic.
Thanks for addressing this. Well, it is in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - instead of answering what
actually justifies that name, there is only another subset of {look in
the first proposal|look at Herbert agreeing (vague)|there are others who
support me so stop wasting my time}.
> >> Why cannot you invent something new to convince us?
> >
> >As I said before I'm unwilling to understand your sarcasm.
Oh Robert... Faster detection of sarcasm demonstrates how good someone
understands the stuff in question.
MfG,
Eduard.
--
Wie verschieden, ob man sich in die Ober- oder Unterlippe beißet!
-- Jean Paul
