On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 21:53, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:39:52PM +0000, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 21:00, Paul Hampson wrote: > > > PostgreSQL requires license changes, and I've not had much luck buiding > > > impetus for this, nor even identified an exact change that would be > > > needed. > > > I'm intrigued as to how the PostgreSQL licence can conflict with > > anything, since it's BSD. > > The libpq3 package in unstable links against OpenSSL, so this falls > under the umbrella of the happifun GPL/OpenSSL license conflict.
One solution then would be a libpq3-nossl package (and -dev). Is there sufficient demand for that? -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C ======================================== "Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord." 1 Corinthians 15:58