On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:04:15AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:52:53PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > >   Description     : De-archiver for .ace files
> > 
> > This is clumsy. Please say "extraction utility for .ace archive files"
> 
> It's analogous to the descriptions in arj and unzip.

... which says nothing of whether those are any good. 

"Archiver for .arj files" is fine, but we don't speak of "de-archivers"
in English. Unarchive is tolerable.

> > or something similar (see descriptions for unarj, zoo etc for ideas).
> These are not in Debian (not in main at least).

Again, irrelevant.

> I don't mind changing it, but you should speak with the maintainers of
> arj and unzip first (just for the sake of consistency).

In the case of package descriptions, I don't think that consistently bad
is better than inconsistent.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Reply via email to