On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:14:53PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I don't know whether to file a bug report or just laugh my head off. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% vrms > Non-free packages installed on espresso > > > doc-linux-nonfree-text Linux HOWTOs in ASCII format (non-free) > doc-rfc-std Standard RFCs > > Now we all know Richard M. Stallman's position on the GFDL, but I find > it extremely ironic that his virtual persona in Debian now discriminates > against his packages which uses a license his real self would approve. > > So is vrms now up for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue > us for misrepresenting him! = ) > > vbranden? > vdlegal? > > Nominations are now open.
I was kind of happy when I saw the Ian or somebody (the original guy) suggest spinning off non-free. Nothing better than redfining a problem not to exist.