John Goerzen writes: >On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:27:00PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: >> release goal of December 1 didn't inspire any new activity. This gives >> the appearance that the ARM port maintainers simply don't care if sarge >> gets released at all. This is very discouraging. > >If that is what happens, then I would say "I simply don't care if sarge >is not released for ARM." > >> of architectures besides x86 and appreciate its multi-platform support. > >Likewise; I run it on three different architectures. > >> But, if those who work on Debian on a given platform are no longer >> interested in putting in the effort necessary to maintain that >> architecture, we really should rethink our committment to it. > >That is very true.
Hmmm s/interested in/capable of/ in some cases maybe, but yes I agree with you. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the SCSI chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles. --- Anthony DeBoer