On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:34:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > Seriously, I think you need to reconsider having the configuration in > > a separate package. > > What're you trying to achieve exactly? > Allowing for different configuration mechanismn. And I (as a user of > exim4) like that very much.
There are plenty of things that could be described that way that don't involve having separate packages. There's a reason the word "exactly" appeared in the question above. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
pgpR3Fn0Toy5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
