Hello! > On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 04:37, Jakob Lell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian woody > Adamantix in now what we want to do, what we want to do is to improve Debian.
``We''? Who is ``we''? It is unlikely that you are one of them royal people, so I take it you meant to say: Adamantix is not what I want to do, what I want to do is to improve Debian. Fair enough. But if I were to improve Debian, I would put PaX in the default kernel source. > > create installation CDs yourselve. For more information about Adamantix, > > see http://trusteddebian.org/ > That URL is obsolete. Right, it is obsolete. Please use http://www.adamantix.org/ instead. Not that it makes any difference, because you end up with the same web page in front of you. > They can not use the "trusted Debian" name any more. ``They''? Who is ``they''? Does ``they'' include Debian developers who actively contribute to Adamantix or not? You don't make any sense here Russell, let me rephrase it again: Peter can not use the "trusted Debian" name any more. Oh yes I can. Martin Michlmayr and I have an agreement that I (you may read ``we'' here if you want) can use the trusteddebian.org domain for the web site and for e-mail (although not for advertising it). That is why you see a big Adamantix logo when you select www.trusteddebian.org. IMHO it was a big win for the project to be renamed from Trusted Debian to Adamantix. > In fact the domain should probably be de-registered to avoid confusion. If anyone appears to be confused here, it seems to be you (again). Groetjes, Peter Busser
