Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:12:21AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> I think you trimmed away content that was crucial for understanding the > parts you did quote, but whatever. If you need reptition or > elaboration, I'll provide it. Please do. I found nothing in your article that seemed to provide answers to my questions. > > I ask again: How do you suggest that the NetBSD people should have > > communicated their misgivings to us? > One possibility would have been to not raise the trademark issues at all. Which would amount to saying "We won't tell you why, but please change your name." I think that would be discouteous in the extreme. > Possible approaches include: > 1) don't ask, don't tell > 2) order us to stop > 3) grant us a license 4) Ask us nicely to stop. > 1) is no longer on the table. They didn't do 3), though they might > still. That leaves 2). And (4). I don't think you have provided *any* evidence that (4) was not what they did, and I think that to react as if (2) was the case would be silly and excessively confrontational. > I'm generally in favor of a "use or lose it" approach to "intellectual > property", but this is more like "be an asshole or lose it". I still cannot see how you imagine that they could have *told* us about their misgivings at all in a way that you wouldn't equal with "being an asshole". -- Henning Makholm "In my opinion, this child don't need to have his head shrunk at all."