On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:09, Frank Küster wrote: > Tilo Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 04 October 2004 20:23, Frank Küster wrote: > >> I must have missed this thread... What is ".bundle" meant to > >> indicate? > > > > On NeXT-Step systems the ".bundle" suffix of a directory indicates > > a dynamically linkable module (basically like a shared lib). > > Is Debian a NeXT-Step system? I guess not. Does ".bundle" have any > meaning to our *users*? I guess no. > > It doesn't really matter whether you can teach the readers of ITP's > on debian-devel what ".bundle" means. The question is whether we > serve our users with what I would call a "cryptic name" for at least > 90% of them.
The intention of my answer was not to argue concerning the gnustep naming issue in any direction - I couldn't care less. The answer doesn't contain a single word regarding the naming discussion. The intention was to answer what I thought was a question of you: > >> I must have missed this thread... What is ".bundle" meant to > >> indicate? But I guess, it wasn't a question so I shouldn't have answered. Regards, Tilo