> Programming is not a matter of "ripping out code".  Backporting
> requires actually understanding all the changes, not some kind of
> mechanical process.

Ok, point taken.  

My argument is just that even if you backport the important features
of a new release into an old codebase, it's hard to make any valuable
claims about the resulting product if the "backport" changes more than
a few lines of code.

-- 
                                        thanks,
                
                                        Will


Reply via email to