Il dom, 2004-10-10 alle 01:32, Henning Makholm ha scritto: > > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary called > > by mutt. > > If it provides /usr/sbin/sendmail, then by definition it is a > mail-transport-agent and should, if packaged, declare itself as such.
No. If you read the first things on msmtp home page (as I did it, before writing here), you'll read that simply you must use its binary (msmtp) from mutt and not "sendmail". > If it provides the same functionality as /usr/sbin/sendmail but with a > different command name, then somebody needs to explain why. I'm not msmtp fan or user, but I lost two minutes to read the home page trying to understand the differences. msmtp is simply a way to delivery mail to a remote smtp server. For example you cannot have it listening on 25 port, so I cannot see it as a sendmail alternative, just like nullmailer or ssmtp or other ones... bye Christian