Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think perl-base should not be Essential, since it will be replaced > anyway once the installation completes. "perl" should be essential though. > (Or can "essential" packages be replaced by dpkg?)
I think maybe you misread the proposal. Under the scheme proposed (which seems like the right one), perl will no longer replace perl-base, but supplement it. In such a scenario, it's perfectly OK for perl-base to be essential. -- Rob -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
