On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:21:35PM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote: > On Wednesday 10 November 2004 13:03, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > OK. (The description didn't mention that it was graphical.) > > Mhmm... isn't KDE library enough? I would never that something > with KDE in it's descriptions has widgets in it. Right, that's > only me. I'll check header files and add ... graphical > library...' or '...widget and helper library...' as appropiate. > Thx for the suggestion.
OK. Maybe KDE library is enough; I know that GNOME has non-visual libraries and the description talked about manipulating the data, nothing about displaying it though. > Pardon? The -gtk and -ruby are extentions/'wrappers' and from different > sources. Ditto for libkexif (beside not be named libexif-kde3). Ahh. I didn't know. Thanks for your ITP then. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>