Em Qui, 2004-11-11 Ãs 13:17 -0500, Daniel Burrows escreveu: > On Thursday 11 November 2004 10:45 am, Mike Hommey wrote: > > It is not necessary. Look at fetchmail, for instance: > > Replaces: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common > > Provides: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common > > Conflicts: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common, logcheck (<< > > 1.1.1-9) > > > > I don't know and didn't check for the others *-ssl packages, though. > > Yes, but if you have fetchmail-ssl installed and not fetchmail, an upgrade > will not install fetchmail. It might result in fetchmail-ssl being removed > (since the new fetchmail-common doesn't provide the version it needs), but > unless some other part of the system depends on fetchmail, you won't end up > with fetchmail installed.
I'm not sure about this. Wouldn't the Provides: fetchmail-ssl on fetchmail satisfy fetchmail-common's relationship needs when upgrading and, thus, be selected for instalation? Thanks, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org>