On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:06:12 -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:51:55PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: >> I'm not sure, how »pornography« is defined in the US and I really >> didn't intend to join your nice discussion, but could you please >> keep in mind, that it just show rough pixely pictures of a drawn >> woman? > It's designed as "soley for the prurient interest." "You know it > when you see it." > The status of justice with her boobs hanging out isn't. This is. It is? > Gray areas are when things like hippies have oral sex on stage and > call it a play. (That isn't pornography.) "Behind the Green Door" > was an artistic movie that primarily serves to demonstrate a woman > deep-throating somebody. That is. > It has to do with intent. The intent here is clear. Egad, you're a mind reader, then? manoj -- May a hundred thousand midgets invade your home singing cheesy lounge-lizard versions of songs from The Wizard of Oz. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C