On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 20:50:25 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 15:07 +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:45:56AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: >> > On 05-Dec-04, 04:55 (CST), James Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > There's no excuse for censorship, ever. >> > > >> > >> > Okay everybody, repeat after me: Choosing not to distribute a >> > given package is NOT censorship. >> >> And telling somebody else that they can't distribute a given >> package IS censorship. >> >> You evidently have chosen not to do it. That's not >> censorship. You're presumably also trying to tell somebody else not >> to do it. That's censorship. > Then the DFSG is censorship, and newspaper editors are censors. > Be real, man. Steve Greenland said it perfectly: "Choosing not to > distribute a given package is NOT censorship. ... This is not a > subtle difference." You choose not to put such a thing in Debian, your choice. You tell me that something I have worked upon, is legal, and free, and my work can't be put into debian because of your narrow morality, then it is indeed censorship. manoj -- What kind of sordid business are you on now? I mean, man, whither goest thou? Whither goest thou, America, in thy shiny car in the night? -- Jack Kerouac Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C