On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 01:08:31 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:57 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:57:19 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > Here's one useful suggestion, I think:
>>
>> > If hot-babe is useful as a .deb, make it available as such
>> > through its own web site or something. This works for many other
>> > packages not accepted into the Debian tree for whatever reason,
>> > why shouldn't it work for hot-babe?
>>
>> The reason other packages are not accepted into Debian is usually
>> license issues -- they are not fre.
> But that's censorship!
No, dear idiot, it is not. We do not distribute illegal
software, cause we are not scofflaws. We do not distribute non--free
stuff, cause that is the core of what we are. And if no DD does the
work, it is not here to be distributed. We do not censor based on
content.
I don't know why I bother explaining all this.
manoj
--
"Nuclear war would really set back cable." Ted Turner
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
