Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> You have not posted anything to this bug, >> neither a patch nor an intent to NMU. And you won't stop me from >> uploading these packages this morning. >> >> I find this extremely annoying. >> [...] > I find >200 failed package builds on the buildd extremly annoying.
I must admit that I didn't know that failed *removals* of build-dependencies would cause the buildd to fail. Nobody cared to indicate that to us. > I'm sorry the NMU annoyed you but I welcome it. There is nothing worse > than a package that kills buildds, esspecially such a common one. I agree. But still LaMont should have expressed his intent to do so, and send the patch to the BTS. I don't have a problem with being NMUed, but with NMUs prepared improperly. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
