Andi writes: > "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of > the SC.
The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG. -- John Hasler
Andi writes: > "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of > the SC.
The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG. -- John Hasler