On 31 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote: > A program I am packaging has a copying policy as follows: > > Only NON-COMMERCIAL distribution allowed.
This puts the package into non-free. However... > Redistribution of > modified versions by other people than myself is not allowed. We need at least the possibility to distribute a modified binary version of the package. If this isn't allowed by that sentence, than the package can't be included in the archive at all. Or do I miss something? > However, commercial use is no problem as long as the software > is NOT being commercially distributed. > Please send your contributions, bugreports, hints etc. to the > author. Thanks ! > > Should this go in contrib or non-free? Thanks, Chris -- _,, Christian Schwarz / o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], ! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / \\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA \ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/ -.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.- "DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!" -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .