On 31 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> A program I am packaging has a copying policy as follows:
>
> Only NON-COMMERCIAL distribution allowed.
This puts the package into non-free. However...
> Redistribution of
> modified versions by other people than myself is not allowed.
We need at least the possibility to distribute a modified binary version
of the package. If this isn't allowed by that sentence, than the package
can't be included in the archive at all. Or do I miss something?
> However, commercial use is no problem as long as the software
> is NOT being commercially distributed.
> Please send your contributions, bugreports, hints etc. to the
> author. Thanks !
>
> Should this go in contrib or non-free?
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
