Op vr, 17-12-2004 te 01:40 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:03:00AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Indeed; however, IMO excerting the right to modify as defined by the > > DFSG should never result in the loss of support, or other negative > > consequences, because in that case you might as well not have it. This > > type of certification does carry that kind of negative consequence. > > But this happens all the time in all kinds of situations
Sure, but that doesn't suddenly make it a good idea. My point is that there must be a better way to fix this. I would suggest an alternative, but I do not know what, exactly, it is in the LSB that makes proprietary developers decide it is not viable. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune