Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok. So maybe ftp-masters shouldn't accept NEW packages, but accept new
>> binary packages (from existing source). This would allow me to close some
>> "unfortunatelly" non-critical bugs, and improve overall sarge quality.
>>
>> I'm sure that I'm not the only one waiting for approval of splitted
>> packages. 
>>
>> This way we're back to the NEW queue discussion and some automatic checks
>> for packages which only incorporate new binary ones.
>
> I thought about writing something like this myself. But I didn't,
> because the logical answer would be "check out
> http://cvs.debian.org/dak/?cvsroot=dak and start working", and I won't
> be able to do that...
>
> Regards, Frank

And it is a mess to configure the first time.

Someone was packaging DAK but hasn't gotten very far yet, esspecialy
handling configuring it. Check the ITPs and ML archive if you are
intrested.

MfG
        Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to