Andy Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Would be able to provide alternative modules for different purposes > > > (such as a simpler one for a brail interface?), with no recoding. This > > > also makes the provision of an X-based install much more reasonable > > > (although IIRC dinstall won't still be running by then?) > > > > For the boot-floppies purpose we won't need any X interface. > > And there was I thinking X would go on the boot floppies. ;) I'm not sure > that this is such an issue for dinstall, but depending on how it gets > split up, some packages (modconf was the example I had in mind) would > benefit from a `native' X-based display.
For modconf you are right. modconf needs a rewrite (probably in C) anyway because it is too slow. > > > Although its normal mode of operation is to dynamically load modules, it > > > would be fairly painless to make a statically linked version (a metter of > > > a couple of defines, in fact), which would also remove the need for libdb > > > etc. > > > > Right. I didn't stress that we have strict disk space > > requirements. But replacing ncurses with slang should give us some > > room. > > Assuming nothing else -- like cfdisk -- uses ncurses, of course ... Currently we have a lowmem root and a normal root. On the lowmem root fdisk is used instead of cfdisk. And Andries Brouwer's sfdisk still doesn't have a curses-like frontend, so this might make another project ... Sven -- Sven Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; WWW : http://www.sax.de/~sr1/ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .