In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The most solid ground not to switch to libc6 is not instability from the > user's point of view (may be libc6 is not that bad), but from the point of > view of developer who's using different kind of commercial developmental > suits. No, that's a good reason not to install libc6 development stuff. It's not a good reason to not install the libc6 runtime and programs that use it, which is what we were talking about. > Unfortunately, as far as I can see, there is no clean way to > have both developmental trees (libc5 and libc6) on the same machine. There cannot be a really good way, but I think they altdev packages are about as good as possible.