Hi Tuomo, Please be so kind and keep the bugnumber address in the Cc line.
Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:54:22PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Could it have been after January 24st? > > Unlikely. Then it is probably not tetex-base's fault. > And shouldn't that problem have surfaced back then instead > of today? It seems that dpkg transparently follows existing symlinks when installing subdirectories in the symlinked dirs (therefore no problem upon installation of the buggy version). But when the buggy version is removed, it removes all empty, unregistered parent directories, and it seems /usr/local is one of these - and it doesn't care whether it is in fact a directory or not. But it is probably an other package that caused this, or the cause is something completely different. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
