On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:49:46AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 05:21:50PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > Also, really huge stuff, like KDE, cannot be uploaded as frequently as > > > perhaps the maintainers would like because it kills the slower buildd's > > > for a few days. > > > > Hypothetical daily KDE builds would also insanely increase the amount of > > network traffic being used by the mirror pulse and people upgrading > > their home boxes, so it isn't just a buildd problem. > > Those would need to go into experimental, where no buildd problem > exists by definition.
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/ (but I agree that the problem is much less important there; and I personally don't really care about it as much as I do about unstable -- the latter contains packages that should at one point try to get released, while the former does not) -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
