Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not complaining about the slow archs, and the m68k buildd failure > will surely be noticed. It has not, however, been retried. Why?
It will most likely be retried manually on a large system. The wanna-build state is then usualy left as "building". There is hardly any point in requeing the package just to have a different buildd pick it up and fail with the same problem. > I'm asking for *information*. How do I find out what the plans are? A good glass ball helps. Some patience and experience help too. There is no way of finding this out short of asking the admin of the buildd that failed. Standard plans of this sort are not publicised, they are just implemented. Screwing up in the postrm of a package in Build-Depends is about the worst you can do to the current buildd. It is pretty sure to cripple them all. The inability of buildds to rebuild their chroots from scratch doesn't help. Shit happens, stop whining and improve the buildd. You are welcome to join the alioth project. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]