On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Gergely, > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > Just to chime in, not saying that maintaining a consistent state between > > architectures is an easy thing and presents no problems, but Debian is > > the only distribution that supports all these many architectures. This > > has the *HUGE* benefit of making the life of those of us who actually > > run quite a few different architectures, to have the same distribution > > on all our machines. > > > So, from my point of view, there aren't too many architectures. > > Actually, the fact that Debian runs on so many architectures is in the > > top five reasons I'm a Debian user. > > Out of curiosity, how many of these architectures are you running stable on?
i386, arm, m68k, mipsel. (alpha, powerpc and possibly sparc will be added to the list when sarge releases; if amd64 was official, that would get added there too) -- Gergely Nagy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
