On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 02:26:43PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > As it has been said earlier, the machines are back, but just need to > > > catch up. So just waiting might be the easiest thing to do. > > More machines can catch up faster than few can do. > > When one machine out of a dozen machines is unavailable, it has less impact > > than one machine failure out of two machines, although the chances will > > raise that a machine will fail somewhen with more machines. But the impact > > is less critical... > > I can't understand why no additional machines are being accepted. > Please clarify this with the wanna-build admin(s).
Been there, done that. The short answer: "We don't want anyone else to play in our playground!" The longer answer: "More machines mean more work for the the buildd admin. Additional buildd admins for those archs are not wanted, because that would need communication between the buildd admins." Because w-b admins are the same persons as the buildd admin for certain archs which give regular problems, you can guess, where the real problem lies. -- Ciao... // Ingo \X/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]