* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050313 23:15]: > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050312 02:05]: > > If, perhaps, there was a clear indication of the buildd ordering > > policy, then it could be properly used. Until then, I go on the basis > > of guesswork.
> The ordering applied is (in this order, first difference wins) > - >= standard > - not uncompiled > - priority of the package > - priority of the section > - name Which goes in front of that ordering is that all buildds check wanna-build in the order of the priority of the suites, i.e. security uploads first, than stable, ..., but only take packages not in noauto, and, if all queues are empty, also take up packages in noauto_weak in the same order (both are individual settings at each buildd). Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]