On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:59:02AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:31:44AM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote: > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The following people in Debian leadership roles have also expressed > > > their support: > > > > Andreas Schuldei (DPL candidate) > > > Angus Lees (DPL candidate) > > > Branden Robinson (DPL candidate) > > > Jonathan Walther (DPL candidate) > > > How exactly is DPL candidate a leadership role? I can understand that > > the aforementioned people are under the spotlights right now because of > > the election, but it does not qualify as leadership. > > > Also, our current DPL isn't listed in the supporters of this plan, does > > it mean that he wasn't consulted? Or does it mean that he was > > consulted, but disagreed? If so, may I ask why? > > Yes, we did consult Martin as well, and he had some concerns about the > proposal that prevented him from signing on to it as-is. That's fine; > and many of those concerns are being discussed now in this thread. I > felt a little silly listing the DPL candidates as supporting it without > also listing the current DPL, but we'd already asked the DPL candidates > about it before Martin got back to us, so I was bound to feel a little > silly either way. ;)
And how do you reconcile the fact that most of those told us recently on debian-vote that they believed that dropping an architecture will not help with the delay of the release ? And giving the times of the posts, they probably knew about this plan previously to replying that, especially those of the scud team. Pure demagogy then ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]