On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:51:28PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:10:36AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We > > *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64, > > powerpc. > > powerpc is clearly a release architecture; the question is whether it > goes on ftp.d.o or scc.d.o. There's a point of view that says that > committing to release powerpc from scc.d.o means that we're committed to > making sure that we *can* release architectures from scc.d.o, which is a > good thing ...
That means that only x86 and amd64 are going to be tier one arches ? That is worse that what was even in the announcement, and i hope i misunderstood this. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
