On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:46:51AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:27:50PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > If I had to think of a rationale for it, the only one I could think of > > would be "the architecture needs to be fast enough not to block security > > updates". > > > > However, I consider an update whose $ARCH binaries are released a week > > later not to be a problem. > > I think a lot of users would consider it a problem. Imagine, would you be > happy with a highly visible public announcement of every vulnerability > against your servers, a week before you got the fix?
If I'm running m68k, I probably wouldn't care so much, and besides -- Debian security announcements are rarely the first highly visible public announcement of a vulnerability. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
